netdev - Re: [PATCH] ar9170: fix for driver-core ABI change

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100310090827.096134f5.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:08:27 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ar9170: fix for driver-core ABI change

Hi Stefan,

On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:00:02 +0100 Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> wrote:
>
> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Greg tells me that the semaphore to mutex change didn't go into Linus'
> > tree.  However, this patch can still be applied as the device_lock/unlock
> > primitives did go in.  I guess that the include of mutex.h is not needed.
> 
> An #include <linux/device.h> seems to be in order though.  It is pulled
> in via linux/usb.h and this is surely not bound to change anytime soon,
> but still.

Damn! Caught by my own "Rule #1" :-)

Thanks.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped