[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100311095329.GA3054@psychotron.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:53:30 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, kaber@...sh.net, fubar@...ibm.com,
bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [Bonding-devel] [net-next-2.6 PATCH 2/3] bonding: check return
value of nofitier when changing type
Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 08:59:09AM CET, jpirko@...hat.com wrote:
>Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:47:10PM CET, shemminger@...ux-foundation.org wrote:
>>On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:29:35 +0100
>>Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
>>> index bcc490c..5de4a15 100644
>>> --- a/net/core/dev.c
>>> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
>>> @@ -1084,9 +1084,9 @@ void netdev_state_change(struct net_device *dev)
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_state_change);
>>>
>>> -void netdev_bonding_change(struct net_device *dev, unsigned long event)
>>> +int netdev_bonding_change(struct net_device *dev, unsigned long event)
>>> {
>>> - call_netdevice_notifiers(event, dev);
>>> + return call_netdevice_notifiers(event, dev);
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_bonding_change);
>>>
>>
>>I don't think all this pre-post stuff needed.
>>Since this is general (not just bonding) how about
>
>Well actually I reused NETDEV_BONDING_OLDTYPE. This and NETDEV_BONDING_NEWTYPE
>is used in inetdev_event() and addrconf_notify(). These functions apparently
>need to be notified before and after the change.
>
>>
>>int netdev_change_type(struct net_device *dev, int newtype)
>>{
>> int ret, oldtype;
>>
>> if (dev->flags & IFF_UP)
>> return -EBUSY;
>>
>> oldtype = dev->type;
>> dev->type = newtype;
Also, the type change is not only about dev->type. See for example
ether_setup(). This function and it's puprose might be misleading...
>> ret = call_netdevice_notifier(NETDEV_CHANGETYPE, dev);
>> ret = notifier_to_errno(ret);
>> if (ret)
>> dev->type = oldtype;
>>
>> return ret;
>>}
>
>I see you point here, but that would be another notifier event. Do you suggest
>to have 3 of them finally? NETDEV_BONDING_OLDTYPE, NETDEV_BONDING_NEWTYPE and
>NETDEV_CHANGETYPE. Looks a bit redundant to me...
>
>Thanks.
>
>Jirka
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists