[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100311.102646.06576136.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:26:46 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: grant.likely@...retlab.ca
Cc: monstr@...str.eu, gregkh@...e.de, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au, jgarzik@...ox.com,
ben-linux@...ff.org, dwmw2@...radead.org,
jeremy.kerr@...onical.com, James.Bottomley@...e.de,
broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
microblaze-uclinux@...e.uq.edu.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/27] Clean up of_platform drivers
Grant you've just posted two enormous patch sets at the SAME EXACT
TIME to the SAME AREAS of the kernel.
One has 37 patches and this one has 27.
Not only are these sets enormous, you haven't specified what in the
world they are against.
The 37 patch set didn't apply cleanly to Linus tree and once I worked
through the rejects as best I could it didn't even compile.
How are people supposed to test this stuff? :-/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists