lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:59:33 +0800
From:	Américo Wang <>
To:	David Miller <>
Subject: Re: 2.6.34-rc1: rcu lockdep bug?

On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 4:07 PM, David Miller <> wrote:
> From: Américo Wang <>
> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:56:03 +0800
>> Ok, after decoding the lockdep output, it looks like that
>> netif_receive_skb() should call rcu_read_lock_bh() instead of rcu_read_lock()?
>> But I don't know if all callers of netif_receive_skb() are in softirq context.
> Normally, netif_receive_skb() is invoked from softirq context.
> However, via netpoll it can be invoked essentially from any context.
> But, when this happens, the networking receive path makes amends such
> that this works fine.  That's what the netpoll_receive_skb() check in
> netif_receive_skb() is for.  That check makes it bail out early if the
> call to netif_receive_skb() is via a netpoll invocation.

Oh, I see. This means we should call rcu_read_lock_bh() instead.
If Paul has no objections, I will send a patch for this.

Thanks much, David!
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists