[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100316181816.GC13529@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:18:16 -0400
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Vitaliy Gusev <vgusev@...nvz.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] route: Fix caught BUG_ON during
rt_secret_rebuild_oneshot()
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 07:08:42PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le mardi 16 mars 2010 à 13:35 -0400, Neil Horman a écrit :
> > >
> > Dave, Eric, Herbert, what are your opinions on this? Is the statistical analysis code
> > mature enough at this point to warrant the removal of the rebuild timer, or
> > should we still keep it as a fallback mechanism?
> > Neil
>
> I believe most heavy duty users dont use newest kernels yet.
>
> (I had to make some changes last month because Paweł Staszewski had
> problems to get a working route cache)
>
> We should wait a bit (one year or two) before removing this timer.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
Ok, I just figured it was time to pose the question, since we'd fixed several
bugs in this area over the last year. Certainly doesn't hurt to keep the
rebuild timer around a bit longer. I re-iterate my ack to Vitaliy's patch then.
Regards
Neil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists