[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100317205206.GA2699@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:52:06 +0100
From: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
To: J�rn Engel <joern@...lin.logfs.org>
Cc: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Regression] r8169: enable 64-bit DMA by default for PCI Express
devices (v2)
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 09:35:01AM +0100, J�rn Engel wrote:
[...]
> I just noticed lspci is also unhappy.
>
> With patch in:
> Bikini:~# lspci -vv > lspci
> pcilib: sysfs_read_vpd: read failed: Connection timed out.
>
> With patch reverted:
> Bikini:~# lspci -vv > lspci2
> Bikini:~# diff -u lspci*
> --- lspci 2010-03-16 09:03:02.000000000 +0100
> +++ lspci2 2010-03-16 09:09:36.000000000 +0100
> @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@
> Vector table: BAR=4 offset=00000000
> PBA: BAR=4 offset=00000800
> Capabilities: [cc] Vital Product Data
> - Not readable
> + Unknown small resource type 00, will not decode more.
Neither looks good.
Did lspci output look different with an older kernel ?
--
Ueimor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists