[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100319095640.42c8d82d@nehalam>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:56:40 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC] GTSM for IPv6
This patch implements Generalized TTL Security Mechanism for IPv6.
It is not tested, but I am putting it out to get feedback about:
* is this the API (setsockout IPV6_MIN_HOPS) that we want to use
* compatibility with IPv4
* minor growth of socket packet info structure
Also RFC doesn't explicitly address GTSM on IPV6.
Maybe the RFC editors think the problem will magically no longer exist
in IPv6 world because everyone will be using IPsec.
---
include/linux/in6.h | 3 +++
include/linux/ipv6.h | 3 ++-
net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c | 12 ++++++++++++
net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c 2010-03-19 09:05:48.038329597 -0700
+++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c 2010-03-19 09:51:12.293647330 -0700
@@ -349,6 +349,12 @@ static void tcp_v6_err(struct sk_buff *s
if (sk->sk_state == TCP_CLOSE)
goto out;
+ np = inet6_sk(sk);
+ if (ipv6_hdr(skb)->hop_limit < np->min_hops) {
+ NET_INC_STATS_BH(net, LINUX_MIB_TCPMINTTLDROP);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
tp = tcp_sk(sk);
seq = ntohl(th->seq);
if (sk->sk_state != TCP_LISTEN &&
@@ -357,8 +363,6 @@ static void tcp_v6_err(struct sk_buff *s
goto out;
}
- np = inet6_sk(sk);
-
if (type == ICMPV6_PKT_TOOBIG) {
struct dst_entry *dst = NULL;
@@ -1675,6 +1679,7 @@ ipv6_pktoptions:
static int tcp_v6_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct tcphdr *th;
+ struct ipv6hdr *hdr;
struct sock *sk;
int ret;
struct net *net = dev_net(skb->dev);
@@ -1701,12 +1706,13 @@ static int tcp_v6_rcv(struct sk_buff *sk
goto bad_packet;
th = tcp_hdr(skb);
+ hdr = ipv6_hdr(skb);
TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq = ntohl(th->seq);
TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq = (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq + th->syn + th->fin +
skb->len - th->doff*4);
TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->ack_seq = ntohl(th->ack_seq);
TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->when = 0;
- TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->flags = ipv6_get_dsfield(ipv6_hdr(skb));
+ TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->flags = ipv6_get_dsfield(hdr);
TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->sacked = 0;
sk = __inet6_lookup_skb(&tcp_hashinfo, skb, th->source, th->dest);
@@ -1717,6 +1723,11 @@ process:
if (sk->sk_state == TCP_TIME_WAIT)
goto do_time_wait;
+ if (hdr->hop_limit < inet6_sk(sk)->min_hops) {
+ NET_INC_STATS_BH(net, LINUX_MIB_TCPMINTTLDROP);
+ goto discard_and_relse;
+ }
+
if (!xfrm6_policy_check(sk, XFRM_POLICY_IN, skb))
goto discard_and_relse;
--- a/include/linux/in6.h 2010-03-19 09:40:24.788957033 -0700
+++ b/include/linux/in6.h 2010-03-19 09:41:41.432704471 -0700
@@ -265,6 +265,9 @@ struct in6_flowlabel_req {
#define IPV6_PREFER_SRC_CGA 0x0008
#define IPV6_PREFER_SRC_NONCGA 0x0800
+/* RFC5082: Generalized Ttl Security Mechanism */
+#define IPV6_MIN_HOPS 73
+
/*
* Multicast Routing:
* see include/linux/mroute6.h.
--- a/include/linux/ipv6.h 2010-03-19 09:26:17.368329255 -0700
+++ b/include/linux/ipv6.h 2010-03-19 09:27:03.929206412 -0700
@@ -348,6 +348,7 @@ struct ipv6_pinfo {
* 010: prefer public address
* 100: prefer care-of address
*/
+ __u8 min_hops;
__u8 tclass;
__u32 dst_cookie;
--- a/net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c 2010-03-19 09:35:40.488016906 -0700
+++ b/net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c 2010-03-19 09:39:57.948026685 -0700
@@ -766,6 +766,14 @@ pref_skip_coa:
break;
}
+ case IPV6_MIN_HOPS:
+ if (optlen < sizeof(int))
+ goto e_inval;
+ if (val < 0 || val > 255)
+ goto e_inval;
+ np->min_hops = val;
+ retv = 0;
+ break;
}
release_sock(sk);
@@ -1114,6 +1122,10 @@ static int do_ipv6_getsockopt(struct soc
val |= IPV6_PREFER_SRC_HOME;
break;
+ case IPV6_MIN_HOPS:
+ val = np->min_hops;
+ break;
+
default:
return -ENOPROTOOPT;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists