[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100319131639.733c53bf@nehalam>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:16:39 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
Cc: Ed Ravin <eravin@...ix.com>, roger.oksanen@...helsinki.fi,
"e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen.hemminger@...tta.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] recent e100 fixes cause kernel panic?
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:42:20 -0700
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com> wrote:
> Added netdev, the place to talk about in-kernel driver problems.
>
> On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 22:39 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > ----- "Ed Ravin" <eravin@...ix.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm using the Vyatta "kenwood" Linux distribution, which is currently
> > > at 2.6.31-1. I upgraded to their latest version, and began seeing
> > > kernel
> > > panics shortly after starting to use ssh/scp on the network connected
> > > to
> > > an e100 NIC. I was able to reproduce the problem immediately after
> > > booting up - sometimes it even crashed during the boot.
> > >
> > > One of the crash logs is attached.
>
> Ed, thanks for the report, looks like these patches introduced a new
> problem. e100 hardware has a tricky data structure that seems to cause
> some problems for (particularly arm) some cpu architectures.
>
> > >
> > > Since the problem seemed to be related to e100.c, I reverted the two
> > > commits to e100.c that had taken place since I last built the kernel
> > > for this box:
> > >
> > > Author: Roger Oksanen <roger.oksanen@...helsinki.fi>
> > > Date: Fri Dec 18 20:18:21 2009 -0800
> > > e100: Fix broken cbs accounting due to missing memset.
> > >
> > > Author: Roger Oksanen <roger.oksanen@...helsinki.fi>
> > > Date: Sun Nov 29 17:17:29 2009 -0800
> > > e100: Use pci pool to work around GFP_ATOMIC order 5 memory
> > > allocation failu
> > >
> > > I rebuilt the kernel and it's not panicking anymore.
>
> so you just reverted both, and its good news things are working again,
> but can you try one or the other and let us know if things still break
> for you?
>
> > The Vyatta kernel for 2.6.31 is based on the 2.6.31.10 + unionfs.
> > These two patches came from the 2.6.31.10 -stable update.
>
> This is the only report of this issue I have heard so far, so something
> must be a little unique to your system or workload such that the driver
> works mostly.
>
> I'm looking more closely into the panic trace now, maybe I can figure it
> out from there.
>
Davem found one thing, the memset wasn't initializing the whole maximum possible
tx ring.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists