netdev - Re: [PATCH] drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/fw.c fix possible double free

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:24:13 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	darrenrjenkins@...il.com
Cc:	inaky.perez-gonzalez@...el.com, linux-wimax@...el.com,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, cindy.h.kao@...el.com,
	dirk.j.brandewie@...el.com, wimax@...uxwimax.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/fw.c fix possible double free

From: Darren Jenkins <darrenrjenkins@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:46:48 +1100

> 
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Inaky Perez-Gonzalez
> <inaky.perez-gonzalez@...el.com> wrote:
> 
>> If krealloc() fails to aallocate a new pointer, the old block is
>> unmodified, so by doing this you are leaking a buffer allocation.
> 
> It seems you are right.
> So now understanding correctly how krealloc() works I can see that the
> double kfree() can only actually happen if the el_size parameter to
> i2400m_zrealloc_2x() is zero, and it isn't at the two call sites.
> 
> So this was a false positive and I am sorry for the noise.

No problem, at least the code got audited :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html