[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BA5F50B.8080302@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:29:31 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC: Sridhar Samudrala <samudrala.sridhar@...il.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, gleb@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Unable to create more than 1 guest virtio-net device using vhost-net
backend
On 03/21/2010 12:15 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> Nothing easy that I can see. Each device needs 2 of these. Avi, Gleb,
>>> any objections to increasing the limit to say 16? That would give us
>>> 5 more devices to the limit of 6 per guest.
>>>
>>>
>> Increase it to 200, then.
>>
> OK. I think we'll also need a smarter allocator
> than bus->dev_count++ than we now have. Right?
>
No, why?
Eventually we'll want faster scanning than the linear search we employ
now, though.
>> Is the limit visible to userspace? If not, we need to expose it.
>>
> I don't think it's visible: it seems to be used in a single
> place in kvm. Let's add an ioctl? Note that qemu doesn't
> need it now ...
>
We usually expose limits via KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION(KVM_CAP_BLAH). We can
expose it via KVM_CAP_IOEVENTFD (and need to reserve iodev entries for
those).
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists