[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BA609E5.40504@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:58:29 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC: Sridhar Samudrala <samudrala.sridhar@...il.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, gleb@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Unable to create more than 1 guest virtio-net device using vhost-net
backend
On 03/21/2010 01:34 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 12:29:31PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> On 03/21/2010 12:15 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>
>>>>> Nothing easy that I can see. Each device needs 2 of these. Avi, Gleb,
>>>>> any objections to increasing the limit to say 16? That would give us
>>>>> 5 more devices to the limit of 6 per guest.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Increase it to 200, then.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> OK. I think we'll also need a smarter allocator
>>> than bus->dev_count++ than we now have. Right?
>>>
>>>
>> No, why?
>>
> We'll run into problems if devices are created/removed in random order,
> won't we?
>
unregister_dev() takes care of it.
>> Eventually we'll want faster scanning than the linear search we employ
>> now, though.
>>
> Yes I suspect with 200 entries we will :). Let's just make it 16 for
> now?
>
Let's make it 200 and fix the performance problems later. Making it 16
is just asking for trouble.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists