[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100321.182846.232914131.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:28:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Cc: timo.teras@....fi, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfrm: cache bundle lookup results in flow cache
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 23:17:51 +0800
> Actually I just realised that the other way we can fix this is
> to make xfrm_dst objects per-cpu just like IPv4 routes. That
> is, when you fail to find an xfrm_dst object in the per-cpu
> cache, you dont' bother calling xfrm_find_bundle but just make
> a new bundle.
How are ipv4 routing cache entries per-cpu? That would screw up route
metrics for TCP sockets quite a lot if they were.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists