| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <7991c5481003231040u3479778dpcb27d9578383afc0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:40:34 -0700 From: Malli <mchilakala@...il.com> To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> Cc: Mallikarjuna R Chilakala <mallikarjuna.chilakala@...el.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: ixgbe: Set IXGBE_RSC_CB(skb)->DMA field to zero after unmapping the address On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 17:59 +0000, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote: >> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/linus/fd3686a842717b890fbe3024b83a616c54d5dba0 >> Commit: fd3686a842717b890fbe3024b83a616c54d5dba0 >> Parent: 936332b8e00103fc20eb7e915c9a3bcb2835a11a >> Author: Mallikarjuna R Chilakala <mallikarjuna.chilakala@...el.com> >> AuthorDate: Fri Mar 19 04:41:33 2010 +0000 >> Committer: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net> >> CommitDate: Fri Mar 19 21:00:44 2010 -0700 >> >> ixgbe: Set IXGBE_RSC_CB(skb)->DMA field to zero after unmapping the address >> >> As per Simon Horman's feedback set IXGBE_RSC_CB(skb)->dma to zero >> after unmapping HWRSC DMA address to avoid double freeing. >> > > Note that this whole code is bogus :-) You cannot just assume that 0 is > a invalid DMA address. It is not. In fact, while you can check if a > dma_addr_t is invalid using dma_mapping_error(), the generic APIs > don't provide you with a magic "bad" value you can use for what you are > trying to do. > > Granted, I think we should make our iommu code reserve the first page > for the sake of everybody's sanity and to avoid such pitfalls, but > this code is wrong with today iommu implementations. > > Cheers, > Ben. Yes. I just realized that i can't assign a zero magic "bad" value. It is only valid in x86/arm/m68k/alpha architecures and not in spark & PowerPC arch, (it should be ~0). In some other architecutres it throws a BUG() on with dma_mapping_error() checks. So the patch is not a total bogus in some architectures :(. May be it is best to create an internal FLAG in IXGBE_RSC_CB(skb) which can be used to avoid this double freeing. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists