netdev - Re: [RFC Patch 1/3] netpoll: add generic support for bridge and bonding devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100322.215822.123414773.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:58:22 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	amwang@...hat.com
Cc:	mpm@...enic.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	gospo@...hat.com, nhorman@...driver.com,
	shemminger@...ux-foundation.org,
	bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, fubar@...ibm.com,
	jmoyer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch 1/3] netpoll: add generic support for bridge and
 bonding devices

From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:47:39 +0800

> Yeah, for bonding case, probably. But for bridge case, I think
> we still need to check all, right?

Why?  Who cares?

If it goes out one port and reaches it's destination
the objective has been achieved.

Sending it out N more times achieves nothing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html