[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87634mh3ib.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 03:12:12 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: alexander.h.duyck@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] net: add additional lock to qdisc to increase enqueue/dequeue fairness
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
> From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:25:53 -0700
>
>> The qdisc layer shows a significant issue when you start transmitting from
>> multiple CPUs.
>
> Why are you hitting any central qdisc lock on a multiqueue
> configuration?
One thing to remember is that systems can have a lot more CPUs than a NIC queues
(e.g. 64 vs 8)
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists