[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BAAE465.1070803@linux-ipv6.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:19:49 +0900
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
To: Shan Wei <shanwei@...fujitsu.com>
CC: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <hideaki.yoshifuji@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Yasuyuki KOZAKAI <yasuyuki.kozakai@...hiba.co.jp>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/7 v2]IPv6:netfilter: defragment
(2010/03/25 11:28), Shan Wei wrote:
> Patrick McHardy wrote, at 03/23/2010 11:05 PM:
>> Shan Wei wrote:
>>>> On the other hand, I'd even say we should NOT send
>>>> icmp here (at least by default) because standard routers
>>>> never send such packet.
>>>>
>>> Yes,for routers, the patch-set does not send icmp message to
>>> source host. It only does on destination host with IPv6 connection
>>> track enable.
>>>
>>
>> The nf-next tree is open again, now would be a good time to resubmit
>> these patches.
>> Thanks!
>
> If no body opposes them, i will resubmit these patches with v3.
>
I still disagree 4-7.
--yoshfuji
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists