netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] Add MSG_WAITFORONE flag to recvmmsg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100327.082910.71119369.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sat, 27 Mar 2010 08:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	acme@...hat.com
Cc:	blblack@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, drepper@...il.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Add MSG_WAITFORONE flag to recvmmsg

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:07:17 -0300

> Em Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 08:54:28PM -0700, David Miller escreveu:
>> From: Brandon L Black <blblack@...il.com>
>> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:18:03 -0500
>> 
>> > 
>> > From: Brandon L Black <blblack@...il.com>
>> > 
>> > Add new flag MSG_WAITFORONE for the recvmmsg() syscall.
>> > When this flag is specified for a blocking socket, recvmmsg()
>> > will only block until at least 1 packet is available.  The
>> > default behavior is to block until all vlen packets are
>> > available.  This flag has no effect on non-blocking sockets
>> > or when used in combination with MSG_DONTWAIT.
>> > 
>> > Signed-off-by: Brandon L Black <blblack@...il.com>
>> 
>> Arnaldo, please review this, thanks.
> 
> I'm ok with it.
> 
> Acked-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>

Applied, thanks everyone.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html