netdev - Re: Seeing new kernel unaligned access messages in linux-next on ia64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 27 Mar 2010 17:17:15 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jengelh@...ozas.de
Cc:	schwab@...ux-m68k.org, tony.luck@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Seeing new kernel unaligned access messages in linux-next on
 ia64

From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 01:11:13 +0100 (CET)

> On Sunday 2010-03-28 00:37, David Miller wrote:
>>
>>> net: fix unaligned access in IFLA_STATS64
>>
>>Applied to net-next-2.6, thanks Jan.
>>
>>Hey, don't we need some adjustments to if_nlmsg_size()?  I don't see
>>it accounting for IFLA_STATS64/"struct rtnl_link_stats64" there.
> 
> If I am not mistaken, the answer is "not strictly". But of course it's 
> nicer if we don't need to realloc just because we were too conservative 
> in the initial calculation.

Right.

> net: increase preallocated size of nlmsg to accomodate for IFLA_STATS64
> 
> When more data is stuffed into an nlmsg than initially projected, an
> extra allocation needs to be done. Reserve enough for IFLA_STATS64 so
> that this does not to needlessy happen.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>

Applied, thanks a lot!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html