[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1269898152.1958.86.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:29:12 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
Cc: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Glen Turner <gdt@....id.au>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: UDP path MTU discovery
Le lundi 29 mars 2010 à 14:01 -0700, Rick Jones a écrit :
> I would get the alphabet soup completely garbled, but the DNS folks are talking
> about EDNS (?) message sizes upwards of 4096 bytes - encryption/authentication
> and other angels being asked to dance on the head of the DNS pin are asking for
> more and more space in the messages.
>
> So, someone will have to blink somewhere - either DNS will have to go TCP and
> *possibly* take RTT hits there depending on various patch streams, or the IEEE
> will have to sanction jumbo frames and people deploy them widely, or it will
> have to become feasible to actually do the occasional IPv6 datagram
> fragmentation and get a timely retransmission out of a UDP application on a PMTU
> hit.
>
1) 4096 bytes UDP messages... well...
2) Using regular TCP for DNS servers... well...
I believe some guys were pushing TCPCT (Cookie Transactions) for this
case ( http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-simpson-tcpct-00.html )
(That is, using an enhanced TCP for long DNS queries... but not only for
DNS...)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists