[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1269901265.8653.408.camel@localhost>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:21:05 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: nhorman@...driver.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, michael.s.gilbert@...il.com,
davem@...emeloft.net, romieu@...zoreil.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] r8169: offical fix for CVE-2009-4537 (overlength frame
DMAs)
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 15:09 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:01:45 +0100
>
> > It also sucks that the secure but low-performance behaviour is enabled
> > for all variants, while AIUI only some suffer from the bug. I realise
> > you probably don't have access to every variant (and neither does
> > Francois) but perhaps you could come up with a test case that could be
> > used to start whitelisting common variants that don't have the bug?
>
> As far as we know all chip variants seem to have the problem.
That's not what I understood from the discussion of the early
back-and-forth changes to receive buffer size.
> Furthermore, this issue has been known about and investigated for
> about 3 months. In that time no better options for handling this
> issue reliably have been discovered and implemented.
>
> Feel free to code up (and test) something better yourself if you don't
> like the fix as it exists currently. :-)
I would have had a go already, if I actually had some of this hardware
to hand. Luckily I have managed to avoid buying any so far. But if
anyone is prepared to loan me a NIC then I promise to have a go at it.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists