[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100330143133.709f542b@nehalam>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:31:33 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ethtool: RXHASH flag support
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:08:48 -0400
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote:
> On 03/30/2010 05:05 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:37:13 -0400
> > Jeff Garzik<jeff@...zik.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On 03/30/2010 01:32 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:29:01 -0400
> >>> Jeff Garzik<jeff@...zik.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> By blindly sync'ing the ethtool.h header, ETHTOOL_MAX_NTUPLE_LIST_ENTRY
> >>>> and its sibling ETHTOOL_MAX_NTUPLE_STRING_PER_ENTRY were removed,
> >>>> breaking the ethtool build.
> >>>
> >>> In the patch I moved it to ethtool.c to have local entries.
> >>>
> >>> I believe that all cloned headers should only come from the result
> >>> of kernel "make install_headers". Not locally different vrsions.
> >>
> >> There is nothing locally different about ethtool-copy.h.
> >>
> >> Jeff
> >
> > diff -u ethtool-copy.h ~/kernel/net-next-2.6/usr/include/linux/ethtool.h
> > --- ethtool-copy.h 2010-03-30 14:03:45.000000000 -0700
> > +++ /home/shemminger/kernel/net-next-2.6/usr/include/linux/ethtool.h 2010-03-30 14:04:30.893866057 -0700
>
> The canonical copy of ethtool-copy.h comes from the kernel tree's
> include/linux/ethtool.h.
>
The difference comes because scripts/headers_install.pl decides to change inline to __inline__.
I think Kbuild is the proper place to do any exported headers cleanup, so I would
rather the automated process work.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists