netdev - Re: UDP path MTU discovery

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:04:51 +0200
From:	"Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@...il.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	"Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@...ing.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>, Glen Turner <gdt@....id.au>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: UDP path MTU discovery

On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 04:12:37PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Where does the application controllable per socket MTU come into the
> > picture?
> 
> To set the minimum path MTU so that there is a guarantee that IPv6 routers
> (which are unable to fragment themselves) will never drop it.

Not sure I agree with that kind of solution but thats probably
because of missunderstandings on my side :)

Thanks for explaning.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html