[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100330130131.8432.43671.stgit@pauliusz>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:01:31 +0300
From: Paulius Zaleckas <paulius.zaleckas@...il.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] skb_put: remove not needed check for skb linearity
It is safe to call skb_put() on packets containing fragments.
Actually I have a case where I allocate packet header with some
extra headroom and then I dynamically add data as frag_list. After
adding frags I have to add more data to header and skb_put()
just BUG's on me :)
And we will save couple instructions for CPU.
Signed-off-by: Paulius Zaleckas <paulius.zaleckas@...il.com>
---
include/linux/skbuff.h | 1 -
net/core/skbuff.c | 1 -
2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
index 124f90c..194e9fa 100644
--- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
+++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
@@ -1108,7 +1108,6 @@ extern unsigned char *skb_put(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int len);
static inline unsigned char *__skb_put(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int len)
{
unsigned char *tmp = skb_tail_pointer(skb);
- SKB_LINEAR_ASSERT(skb);
skb->tail += len;
skb->len += len;
return tmp;
diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index 93c4e06..ea1ca61 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -1011,7 +1011,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_pad);
unsigned char *skb_put(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int len)
{
unsigned char *tmp = skb_tail_pointer(skb);
- SKB_LINEAR_ASSERT(skb);
skb->tail += len;
skb->len += len;
if (unlikely(skb->tail > skb->end))
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists