netdev - [PATCH 3/4] xfrm: remove policy lock when accessing policy->walk.dead

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1270030626-16687-5-git-send-email-timo.teras@iki.fi>
Date:	Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:17:05 +0300
From:	Timo Teras <timo.teras@....fi>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	Timo Teras <timo.teras@....fi>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] xfrm: remove policy lock when accessing policy->walk.dead

All of the code considers ->dead as a hint that the cached policy
needs to get refreshed. The read side can just drop the read lock
without any side effects.

The write side needs to make sure that it's written only exactly
once. Only possible race is at xfrm_policy_kill(). This is fixed
by checking result of __xfrm_policy_unlink() when needed. It will
always succeed if the policy object is looked up from the hash
list (so some checks are removed), but it needs to be checked if
we are trying to unlink policy via a reference (appropriate
checks added).

Since policy->walk.dead is written exactly once, it no longer
needs to be protected with a write lock.

Signed-off-by: Timo Teras <timo.teras@....fi>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c |   31 +++++++++----------------------
 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c   |    6 +-----
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
index 843e066..82789cf 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static void xfrm_policy_timer(unsigned long data)
 
 	read_lock(&xp->lock);
 
-	if (xp->walk.dead)
+	if (unlikely(xp->walk.dead))
 		goto out;
 
 	dir = xfrm_policy_id2dir(xp->index);
@@ -297,17 +297,7 @@ static DECLARE_WORK(xfrm_policy_gc_work, xfrm_policy_gc_task);
 
 static void xfrm_policy_kill(struct xfrm_policy *policy)
 {
-	int dead;
-
-	write_lock_bh(&policy->lock);
-	dead = policy->walk.dead;
 	policy->walk.dead = 1;
-	write_unlock_bh(&policy->lock);
-
-	if (unlikely(dead)) {
-		WARN_ON(1);
-		return;
-	}
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&xfrm_policy_gc_lock);
 	hlist_add_head(&policy->bydst, &xfrm_policy_gc_list);
@@ -776,7 +766,6 @@ xfrm_policy_flush_secctx_check(struct net *net, u8 type, struct xfrm_audit *audi
 int xfrm_policy_flush(struct net *net, u8 type, struct xfrm_audit *audit_info)
 {
 	int dir, err = 0, cnt = 0;
-	struct xfrm_policy *dp;
 
 	write_lock_bh(&xfrm_policy_lock);
 
@@ -794,10 +783,9 @@ int xfrm_policy_flush(struct net *net, u8 type, struct xfrm_audit *audit_info)
 				     &net->xfrm.policy_inexact[dir], bydst) {
 			if (pol->type != type)
 				continue;
-			dp = __xfrm_policy_unlink(pol, dir);
+			__xfrm_policy_unlink(pol, dir);
 			write_unlock_bh(&xfrm_policy_lock);
-			if (dp)
-				cnt++;
+			cnt++;
 
 			xfrm_audit_policy_delete(pol, 1, audit_info->loginuid,
 						 audit_info->sessionid,
@@ -816,10 +804,9 @@ int xfrm_policy_flush(struct net *net, u8 type, struct xfrm_audit *audit_info)
 					     bydst) {
 				if (pol->type != type)
 					continue;
-				dp = __xfrm_policy_unlink(pol, dir);
+				__xfrm_policy_unlink(pol, dir);
 				write_unlock_bh(&xfrm_policy_lock);
-				if (dp)
-					cnt++;
+				cnt++;
 
 				xfrm_audit_policy_delete(pol, 1,
 							 audit_info->loginuid,
@@ -1132,6 +1119,9 @@ int xfrm_sk_policy_insert(struct sock *sk, int dir, struct xfrm_policy *pol)
 		__xfrm_policy_link(pol, XFRM_POLICY_MAX+dir);
 	}
 	if (old_pol)
+		/* Unlinking succeeds always. This is the only function
+		 * allowed to delete or replace socket policy.
+		 */
 		__xfrm_policy_unlink(old_pol, XFRM_POLICY_MAX+dir);
 	write_unlock_bh(&xfrm_policy_lock);
 
@@ -1737,11 +1727,8 @@ restart:
 			goto error;
 		}
 
-		for (pi = 0; pi < npols; pi++) {
-			read_lock_bh(&pols[pi]->lock);
+		for (pi = 0; pi < npols; pi++)
 			pol_dead |= pols[pi]->walk.dead;
-			read_unlock_bh(&pols[pi]->lock);
-		}
 
 		write_lock_bh(&policy->lock);
 		if (unlikely(pol_dead || stale_bundle(dst))) {
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
index da5ba86..a267fbd 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
@@ -1770,13 +1770,9 @@ static int xfrm_add_pol_expire(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
 	if (xp == NULL)
 		return -ENOENT;
 
-	read_lock(&xp->lock);
-	if (xp->walk.dead) {
-		read_unlock(&xp->lock);
+	if (unlikely(xp->walk.dead))
 		goto out;
-	}
 
-	read_unlock(&xp->lock);
 	err = 0;
 	if (up->hard) {
 		uid_t loginuid = NETLINK_CB(skb).loginuid;
-- 
1.6.3.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html