netdev - Re: [PATCH 3/4] xfrm: remove policy lock when accessing policy->walk.dead

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 31 Mar 2010 09:41:23 -0400
From:	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	Timo Teras <timo.teras@....fi>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] xfrm: remove policy lock when accessing
 policy->walk.dead


On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 09:39 -0400, jamal wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 09:32 -0400, jamal wrote:
> 
> > I did not touch pfkey. That behavior remains there. 
> 
> Sorry - I lied. I did touch pfkey. Here was my reasoning.

And what I meant by not touching is that "the behavior there
remains as it was before"

cheers,
jamal

> RFC 2367 says flushing behavior should be:
> 1) user space -> kernel: flush
> 2) kernel: flush
> 3) kernel -> user space: flush event to ALL listeners
> 
> This is not realistic today in the presence of selinux policies
> which may reject the flush etc. So we make the sequence become:
> 1) user space -> kernel: flush
> 2) kernel: flush
> 3) kernel -> user space: flush response to originater from #1
> 4) if there were no errors then:
> kernel -> user space: flush event to ALL listeners
> 
> This was in the logs.
> 
> cheers,
> jamal

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html