[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1270019601.25337.7.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:13:21 -0700
From: Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] virtio_net: use NAPI for xmit (UNTESTED)
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 14:29 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> +static int virtnet_xmit_poll(struct napi_struct *xmit_napi, int
> budget)
> +{
> + struct virtnet_info *vi =
> + container_of(xmit_napi, struct virtnet_info,
> xmit_napi);
> +
> + /* Don't access vq/capacity at same time as start_xmit. */
> + __netif_tx_lock(netdev_get_tx_queue(vi->dev, 0),
> smp_processor_id());
> +
> + vi->capacity += free_old_xmit_skbs(vi);
> + if (vi->capacity >= 2 + MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {
> + /* Suppress further xmit interrupts. */
> + vi->svq->vq_ops->disable_cb(vi->svq);
> + napi_complete(xmit_napi);
> +
> + /* Don't wake it if link is down. */
> + if (likely(netif_carrier_ok(vi->vdev)))
This should be if (likely(netif_carrier_ok(vi->dev)))
> + netif_wake_queue(vi->dev);
> + }
> +
> + __netif_tx_unlock(netdev_get_tx_queue(vi->dev, 0));
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
I tested the backport patch with vhost on, the initial netperf test
result showed BW performance decreased 10% with same cpu utilization. I
will look at it tomorrow.
Shirley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists