[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1270107034.2229.5.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 09:30:34 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: James Chapman <jchapman@...alix.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/12] l2tp: Add ppp device name to L2TP ppp session
data
Le jeudi 01 avril 2010 à 08:19 +0100, James Chapman a écrit :
> There might be thousands of L2TP sessions in some setups. Populating
> sysfs with a link for each of those sessions isn't practical. The
> existing /proc file dumps its info as a single text file for this
> reason. I'd also like to provide the device name in the session netlink
> message, which is the interface used by l2tp userspace, so I need a
> kernel API to retrieve the device name from ppp.
>
> I like the suggestion of using debugfs for access to driver debug info
> though. I propose leaving the /proc file for L2TPv2 only, removing the
> L2TPv3 data that I added to the proc file in this patch series, to
> retain compatibility with the existing driver. This would show only
> L2TPv2 sessions and tunnels. For new driver functionality (L2TPv3 etc),
> use debugfs. The debugfs files would dump lists in a similar form to the
> current code, listing all tunnels (L2TPv2 and L2TPv3) in a single file.
> Using debugfs gives more flexibility for adding additional info later,
> as required. How does that sound?
>
debugfs ? I dont get it, sorry.
Why not using netlink, as most iproute2 utilities do ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists