[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2010 08:50:41 +0300
From: Timo Teräs <timo.teras@....fi>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] flow: virtualize flow cache entry methods
Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 11:19:04PM +0300, Timo Teräs wrote:
>> If someone is then removing a net driver, we still execute
>> flush on the 'device down' hook, and all stale bundles
>> get flushed.
>
> Not if the bundle belongs to a policy recently deleted.
>
>> But yes, this means that xfrm_policy struct can now be held
>> allocated up to ten extra minutes. But it's only memory that
>> it's holding, not any extra refs. And it's still reclaimable
>> by the GC.
>
> You also hold down the bundle xdst's along with it, which can
> hold netdev references preventing modules from being unloaded.
>
>> If this feels troublesome, we could add asynchronous flush
>> request that would be called on policy removal. Or even stick
>> to the synchronous one.
>
> How about change xfrm_flush_bundles to flush bundles from the
> cache instead of xfrm_policy?
For the common case:
1. Policy deleted; policy->walk.dead set, policy->genid incremented
2. NETDEV_DOWN hook called, calls flow_cache_flush()
3. flow_cache_flush enumerates all policy and bundle refs
in it's cache
4. for each bundle xfrm_bundle_check_fce() is called, which
calls stale_bundle()
5. all bundles using stale policy, fail that check because
xdst->policy_genid != xdst->pols[0]->genid
(checked in xfrm_bundle_ok)
6. flow cache calls entry's ->delete which is dst_free for bundles
7. flow_cache_flush() returns
flow_cache_flush really frees the bundles in it on flush.
But now that I look my code again. Your statement is true for
per-socket bundles. They would not get deleted in this case.
I'll change NETDEV_DOWN to call garbage collect instead of
flow cache flush which will then also free the per-socket bundles.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists