[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2010 09:07:12 +0300
From: Timo Teräs <timo.teras@....fi>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] flow: virtualize flow cache entry methods
Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 08:50:41AM +0300, Timo Teräs wrote:
>> For the common case:
>>
>> 1. Policy deleted; policy->walk.dead set, policy->genid incremented
>> 2. NETDEV_DOWN hook called, calls flow_cache_flush()
>> 3. flow_cache_flush enumerates all policy and bundle refs
>> in it's cache
>> 4. for each bundle xfrm_bundle_check_fce() is called, which
>> calls stale_bundle()
>> 5. all bundles using stale policy, fail that check because
>> xdst->policy_genid != xdst->pols[0]->genid
>> (checked in xfrm_bundle_ok)
>> 6. flow cache calls entry's ->delete which is dst_free for bundles
>> 7. flow_cache_flush() returns
>
> Ah, you're doing it in 2/4. Can we please have each patch be
> a self-contained unit? It should be possible to apply 1/4 and
> have a resulting kernel that works properly without having to
> apply the rest of your patches.
With 1/4 only, the bundle deletion is not touched. In that case
the policy GC deletes explicitly the bundles. The bundles get
deleted immediately, and only the struct xfrm_policy might get
held up allocated longer.
The code flow would be:
1. xfrm_policy_kill() queues to GC
2. xfrm_policy_gc_kill() called from xfrm_policy_gc_task()
frees all bundles in that policy
3. xfrm_policy_gc_kill() releases it's reference
4. ... time passes (flush, randomization, or flow hit occurs)
5. flow cache releases it's final reference, calls
xfrm_policy_destroy() which only frees the xfrm_policy memory
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists