netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/3] IPv6: Generic TTL Security Mechanism (original version)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4BB96B9A.3000203@linux-ipv6.org>
Date:	Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:48:26 +0900
From:	YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
CC:	davem@...emloft.net, Pekka Savola <pekkas@...core.fi>,
	Nick Hilliard <nick@...x.ie>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] IPv6: Generic TTL Security Mechanism (original version)

Hi,

(2010/04/04 8:21), Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> The original proposed code; the IPV6 and IPV4 socket options are seperate.
> With this method, the server does have to deal with both IPv4 and IPv6
> socket options and the client has to handle the different for each
> family.

I am for 1/3 (original), not for 2/3, 3/3.

Because we should allow users to set respective value
for IPv4 and IPv6, as we allow users to do so for TTL
and hoplimit itself.

--yoshfuji

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html