[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100407223445.GA15810@verge.net.au>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 08:34:46 +1000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc: wzt.wzt@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Wensong Zhang <wensong@...ux-vs.org>,
Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPVS: replace sprintf to snprintf to avoid stack
buffer overflow
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 06:09:54PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 10:50:20AM +0800, wzt.wzt@...il.com wrote:
> >> IPVS not check the length of pp->name, use sprintf will cause stack buffer overflow.
> >> struct ip_vs_protocol{} declare name as char *, if register a protocol as:
> >> struct ip_vs_protocol ip_vs_test = {
> >> .name = "aaaaaaaa....128...aaa",
> >> .debug_packet = ip_vs_tcpudp_debug_packet,
> >> };
> >>
> >> when called ip_vs_tcpudp_debug_packet(), sprintf(buf, "%s TRUNCATED", pp->name);
> >> will cause stack buffer overflow.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Zhitong Wang <zhitong.wangzt@...baba-inc.com>
> >
> > I think that the simple answer is, don't do that.
>
> Indeed.
>
> > But your patch seems entirely reasonable to me.
> >
> > Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
> >
> > Patrick, please consider merging this.
>
> I think this fix is a bit silly, we can simply print the name in
> the pr_debug() statement and avoid both the potential overflow
> and truncation.
>
> How does this look?
Looks good to me:
Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists