[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100408123545.GA23829@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 20:35:45 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: netfilter: Only do skb_checksum_help on CHECKSUM_PARTIAL in
ip_queue
Hi:
netfilter: Only do skb_checksum_help on CHECKSUM_PARTIAL in ip_queue
While doing yet another audit on ip_summed I noticed ip_queue
calling skb_checksum_help unnecessarily. As we will set ip_summed
to CHECKSUM_NONE when necessary in ipq_mangle_ipv4, there is no
need to zap CHECKSUM_COMPLETE in ipq_build_packet_message.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_queue.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_queue.c
index e278704..c838238 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_queue.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_queue.c
@@ -161,8 +161,7 @@ ipq_build_packet_message(struct nf_queue_entry *entry, int *errp)
break;
case IPQ_COPY_PACKET:
- if ((entry->skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL ||
- entry->skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_COMPLETE) &&
+ if (entry->skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL &&
(*errp = skb_checksum_help(entry->skb))) {
read_unlock_bh(&queue_lock);
return NULL;
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists