[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1270737440.1872.93.camel@sakura.staff.proxad.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:37:20 +0200
From: Maxime Bizon <mbizon@...ebox.fr>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: dhcp client packet sniffing...
On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 22:27 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Oh and if anybody is doing any user-space hacking, this is what you
> could do: AF_PACKET is only necessary when you're waiting for a
> response from the server. So you could close the socket after a
> lease has been acquired, and reopen it the next time you need
> to communicate with a server.
That's already what some clients do (at least udhcpc from busybox)
The packet socket is only needed during "init_selecting", "init_reboot",
"requesting" and "rebinding" state.
For "bound" or "requesting" state (in which you spend most of the time),
the packet socket is not needed and a standard AF_INET dgram socket can
be used instead.
You can't close the socket while bound since you can receive DHCPINFORM
anytime.
--
Maxime
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists