netdev - Re: patch to improve x.25 throughput negotiation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100407.213314.156725109.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 07 Apr 2010 21:33:14 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	andrew.hendry@...il.com
Cc:	john@...va.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: patch to improve x.25 throughput negotiation

From: andrew hendry <andrew.hendry@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 22:09:10 +1000

> I have reproduced a few ways.
> 1. X25_MASK_THROUGHPUT on the x25_subscript_struct, then call
> SIOCX25SSUBSCRIP, then call SIOCX25FACILITIES without setting the
> throughput field. Call connect.
> 2. No subscrip setting, call SIOCX25FACILITIES without setting the
> throughput field. Call connect.
> 3. No subcrip, no facilities ioctl, call connect.
> 
> The patch removes the bad facility and makes the router accept the
> call for the above cases.
> I don't currently have a setup to test both direction throughput negotiation.
> 
> Tested-by: Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@...il.com>

Patch applied, thanks everyone.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html