[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <l2q65634d661004090650z12b8c192u866c812477fddf11@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 06:50:44 -0700
From: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] rfs: Receive Flow Steering
>> * @mc_ttl - Multicasting TTL
>> * @is_icsk - is this an inet_connection_sock?
>> @@ -124,6 +126,9 @@ struct inet_sock {
>> __u16 cmsg_flags;
>> __be16 inet_sport;
>> __u16 inet_id;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
>> + __u32 rxhash;
>> +#endif
>
> I am a bit worried, because dirtying this cache line might hurt non RPS
> setups (if network interrupts are balanced to all cpus)
>
The rxhash should only be written when it changes. So as long as
device or lower stack provide a consistent rxhash for a connection
this should be okay.
> Best place would be to put rxhash close to sk_refcnt (because we dirty
> it to get a reference on rcu sk lookups)
>
In sock_common?... I don't know if we need this in every socket yet.
> I believe we have a 32bits hole on 64bit arches for this :)
>
>
> While testint latest net-nex-2.6 on my nehalem machine, I got a crash
> (in RPS I am afraid...)
>
> I am going to correct this crash before testing RFS and let you know the
> results.
Thanks for doing that.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists