netdev - Re: mmotm 2010-04-05-16-09 uploaded

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4BBF3E6C.5010708@trash.net>
Date:	Fri, 09 Apr 2010 16:49:16 +0200
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mmotm 2010-04-05-16-09 uploaded

Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:36:07 +0200, Patrick McHardy said:
> 
>> Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> 
>>> Well, it *changed* it.  Does the rcu_defererence_check() only fire on the
>>> first time it hits something, so we've fixed the first one and now we get to
>>> see the second one?
>> It appears that way, otherwise you should have seen a second warning in
>> nf_conntrack_ecache the last time.
>>
>>> (For what it's worth, if this is going to be one-at-a-time whack-a-mole, I'm
>>> OK on that, just want to know up front.)
>> I went through the other files and I believe this should be it.
>> We already removed most of these incorrect rcu_dereference()
>> calls a while back.
> 
> Confirming - the second version of the patch fixes all the network-related
> RCU complaints I've been able to trigger...

Thanks. I've added the attached commit to the nf-next tree. I'll push
it to Dave shortly so this can get included in the next tree.


View attachment "x" of type "text/plain" (4010 bytes)