netdev - Re: IGB handling of zero length checksumming?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100411.144235.226765248.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:42:35 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
	bruce.w.allan@...el.com, alexander.h.duyck@...el.com,
	peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com, john.ronciak@...el.com
Subject: Re: IGB handling of zero length checksumming?

From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 02:40:27 -0700 (PDT)

> 
> If the IGB is given a "skb->ip_summed === CHECKSUM_PARTIAL" packet and
> the data area past the TCP header is of zero length, will it do the
> right thing?

Hey guys you don't have to worry about this.

The problem turned out to be somewhere else. :-)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html