[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BC32F7A.4040809@ruggedcom.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:34:34 -0400
From: Michael Barkowski <michaelbarkowski@...gedcom.com>
To: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: hdlc_ppp: why no detach()?
Michael Barkowski wrote:
> Hello Krzyztof,
>
> I am looking at your hdlc_ppp code and I don't understand: why is there
> not the equivalent of fr_detach() in there?
>
> pc8300_drv:cpc_remove_one() frees netdevs quite confidently but I wonder
> how it can be so sure that there are not skbs in hdlc_ppp's tx_queue
> associated with those devices before freeing them....
>
the above is the real danger I see - free the netdev, then ppp's timer
comes along and dequeues from tx_queue an skb with invalid device.
> Even if you wanted to switch a device from PPP to Frame Relay, I don't
> see the method right now. If I may ask, please, what am I missing?
>
Ok - this part was a momentary lapse on my part - please strike from
the record :)
> If you agree there is a need for detach(), I would be happy to work on
> it and make a submission.
>
> thanks for your time,
>
--
Michael Barkowski
905-482-4577
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists