[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <EA929A9653AAE14F841771FB1DE5A1365FE4FCE12C@rrsmsx501.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:17:49 -0600
From: "Tantilov, Emil S" <emil.s.tantilov@...el.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/4] IPv6: keep route for tentative address
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Recent changes preserve IPv6 address when link goes down (good).
> But would cause address to point to dead dst entry (bad).
> The simplest fix is to just not delete route if address is
> being held for later use.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
>
>
> --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c 2010-04-11 12:19:37.938082190 -0700
> +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c 2010-04-11 12:25:05.349309074 -0700
> @@ -4046,7 +4046,8 @@ static void __ipv6_ifa_notify(int event,
> addrconf_leave_anycast(ifp);
> addrconf_leave_solict(ifp->idev, &ifp->addr);
> dst_hold(&ifp->rt->u.dst);
> - if (ip6_del_rt(ifp->rt))
> +
> + if (ifp->dead && ip6_del_rt(ifp->rt))
> dst_free(&ifp->rt->u.dst);
> break;
> }
Stephen,
With these series of patches (1-4) applied I am no longer seeing the
hangs and warnings associated with ipv6. I ran few rounds of
tests with resetting the interface and loading/unloading modules.
Thanks a lot for looking into this!
Emil--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists