[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <u2y412e6f7f1004121618p6d6eff30q8a45a03faa59a912@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 07:18:42 +0800
From: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
To: Benny Amorsen <benny+usenet@...rsen.dk>
Cc: zhigang gong <zhigang.gong@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Strange packet drops with heavy firewalling
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Benny Amorsen <benny+usenet@...rsen.dk> wrote:
>
> 99: 24 1306226 3 2 PCI-MSI-edge eth1-tx-0
> 100: 15735 1648774 3 7 PCI-MSI-edge eth1-tx-1
> 101: 8 11 9 1083022 PCI-MSI-edge eth1-tx-2
> 102: 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth1-tx-3
> 103: 18 15 6131 1095383 PCI-MSI-edge eth1-rx-0
> 104: 217 32 46544 1335325 PCI-MSI-edge eth1-rx-1
> 105: 154 1305595 218 16 PCI-MSI-edge eth1-rx-2
> 106: 17 16 8229 1467509 PCI-MSI-edge eth1-rx-3
> 107: 0 0 1 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth1
> 108: 2 14 15 1003053 PCI-MSI-edge eth0-tx-0
> 109: 8226 1668924 478 487 PCI-MSI-edge eth0-tx-1
> 110: 3 1188874 17 12 PCI-MSI-edge eth0-tx-2
> 111: 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth0-tx-3
> 112: 203 185 5324 1015263 PCI-MSI-edge eth0-rx-0
> 113: 4141 1600793 153 159 PCI-MSI-edge eth0-rx-1
> 114: 16242 1210108 436 3124 PCI-MSI-edge eth0-rx-2
> 115: 267 4173 19471 1321252 PCI-MSI-edge eth0-rx-3
> 116: 0 1 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth0
>
>
> irqbalanced seems to have picked CPU1 and CPU3 for all the interrupts,
> which to my mind should cause the same problem as before (where CPU1 and
> CPU3 was handling all packets). Yet the box clearly works much better
> than before.
irqbalanced? I don't think it can work properly. Try RPS in netdev and
linux-next tree, and if cpu load isn't even, try this patch:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/49915/ .
--
Regards,
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@...il.com)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists