netdev - Re: Linux arp flux problem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <382005.89009.qm@web31503.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date:	Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:18:06 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Ming-Ching Tiew <mctiew@...oo.com>
To:	Net Dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux arp flux problem



--- On Mon, 4/12/10, Ming-Ching Tiew <mctiew@...oo.com> wrote:

> From: Ming-Ching Tiew <mctiew@...oo.com>
> Subject: Linux arp flux problem
> To: "Net Dev" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
> Date: Monday, April 12, 2010, 3:16 AM
> 
> The following link explains the Linux arp flux problem
> pretty well, and I myself have been burnt badly by a life
> site where the "arp_filter" does not help at all.
> 
>          http://linux-ip.net/html/ether-arp.html
> 
> And I tested the kernel patch by Julian Anastasov, and it
> works 100% reliably :-
> 
>          http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#hidden
> 
> My question is the patches has been around for many years,
> why has it not been included into the kernel ? Is it that
> Linux is supposed to have this "side effects" of arp linux
> on purpose ?
> 

May I propose that the said patch ( http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#hidden )
be accepted into the kernel. And if it does not qualify, may I know why ?

Thank you.


      
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html