netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] net: batch skb dequeueing from softnet input_pkt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:37:42 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: batch skb dequeueing from softnet
 input_pkt_queue

Le mardi 13 avril 2010 à 21:38 +0800, Changli Gao a écrit :
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > This is a problem of cooperation between flush_backlog() and
> > process_backlog(). Dont allow flush_backlog() to return if
> > process_backlog() is running. Exactly as before, but lock acquisition
> > done in flush_backlog() should be a bit smarter.
> >
> 
> flush_backlog() is called in IRQ context. Unless you disable irq in
> process_backlog(), you can't block flush_backlog().
> 

There is nothing preventing flush_backlog() to be done differently you
know. It was done like that because it was the most simple thing to do
given the (basic) constraints. Now if the constraints change,
implementation might change too. It is slow path (in most setups) and
some extra work to keep fast path really fast is ok.

netdevice are dismantled and we respect an RCU grace period before
freeing. process_backlog() is done inside a rcu lock, so everything is
possible.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html