[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <21DAC78125424ED291B5D6477CFF9657@amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:32:22 -0700
From: "Sean Hefty" <sean.hefty@...el.com>
To: "'Tetsuo Handa'" <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
<amwang@...hat.com>, <rolandd@...co.com>
Cc: <opurdila@...acom.com>, <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <nhorman@...driver.com>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [Patch 3/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers
>Sean and Roland, is below patch correct?
>inet_is_reserved_local_port() is the new function proposed in this patchset.
It looks correct to me. I didn't test the patch series, but if I comment out
the call to inet_is_reserved_local_port() in the provided below, the changes
worked fine for me.
Acked-by: Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists