[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1271142857.16881.193.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:14:17 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code:
avahi-daemon: caller is netif_rx
Le lundi 12 avril 2010 à 13:54 -0700, Tom Herbert a écrit :
> Would it be better to disable preemption in netif_rx? Also note that
> with RFS we would be taking rcu_read_lock in netif_rx anyway and that
> could cover all the instances of smp_processor_id().
>
Ok that makes sense.
What do you think applying a small fix before RFS integration, it is
better to have smaller patches anyway :)
[PATCH net-next-2.6] net: netif_rx() must disable preemption
Eric Paris reported netif_rx() is calling smp_processor_id() from
preemptible context, in particular when caller is
ip_dev_loopback_xmit().
RPS commit added this smp_processor_id() call, this patch makes sure
preemption is disabled. rps_get_cpus() wants rcu_read_lock() anyway, we
can dot it a bit earlier.
Reported-by: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
---
net/core/dev.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index a10a216..a96ea6a 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -2206,6 +2206,7 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct netif_rx_stats, netdev_rx_stat) = { 0, };
/*
* get_rps_cpu is called from netif_receive_skb and returns the target
* CPU from the RPS map of the receiving queue for a given skb.
+ * rcu_read_lock must be held on entry.
*/
static int get_rps_cpu(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
@@ -2217,8 +2218,6 @@ static int get_rps_cpu(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
u8 ip_proto;
u32 addr1, addr2, ports, ihl;
- rcu_read_lock();
-
if (skb_rx_queue_recorded(skb)) {
u16 index = skb_get_rx_queue(skb);
if (unlikely(index >= dev->num_rx_queues)) {
@@ -2296,7 +2295,6 @@ got_hash:
}
done:
- rcu_read_unlock();
return cpu;
}
@@ -2392,7 +2390,7 @@ enqueue:
int netif_rx(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
- int cpu;
+ int ret;
/* if netpoll wants it, pretend we never saw it */
if (netpoll_rx(skb))
@@ -2402,14 +2400,21 @@ int netif_rx(struct sk_buff *skb)
net_timestamp(skb);
#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
+ {
+ int cpu;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
cpu = get_rps_cpu(skb->dev, skb);
if (cpu < 0)
cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ ret = enqueue_to_backlog(skb, cpu);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ }
#else
- cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ ret = enqueue_to_backlog(skb, get_cpu());
+ put_cpu();
#endif
-
- return enqueue_to_backlog(skb, cpu);
+ return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netif_rx);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists