[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100413.015232.67916764.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 01:52:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: sk_dst_cache RCUification
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 11:03:29 +0200
> With latest CONFIG_PROVE_RCU stuff, I felt more comfortable to make this
> work.
>
> sk->sk_dst_cache is currently protected by a rwlock (sk_dst_lock)
>
> This rwlock is readlocked for a very small amount of time, and dst
> entries are already freed after RCU grace period. This calls for RCU
> again :)
>
> This patch converts sk_dst_lock to a spinlock, and use RCU for readers.
>
> __sk_dst_get() is supposed to be called with rcu_read_lock() or if
> socket locked by user, so use appropriate rcu_dereference_check()
> condition (rcu_read_lock_held() || sock_owned_by_user(sk))
>
> This patch avoids two atomic ops per tx packet on UDP connected sockets,
> for example, and permits sk_dst_lock to be much less dirtied.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Applied, thanks for doing this work Eric.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists