[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <u2r412e6f7f1004140025i51e533c9t7402bc751dd925c2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:25:01 +0800
From: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix potential wild pointer when NIC is dying
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> Le mercredi 14 avril 2010 à 20:18 +0800, Changli Gao a écrit :
>
> I dont see how the problem can happens, and how RPS is involved.
>
> Did you got a single panic, could you provide us a stack trace ?
>
> Maybe are you referring to NAPI ?
>
> NAPI process packets delivered by NIC, and through RPS deliver it to a
> (possibly) remote CPU queue.
>
> But at device dismantle time, we should stop NAPI on this device and
> packet delivery machinery. RPS being on or not, NAPI wont deliver new
> packets. The fact that NAPI can be throtled doesnt change the napi
> instance being disabled at this point. No more packet will be delivered
> (RPS or not)
>
> Only after this point we call flush_backlog() to make sure we dont have
> any queued packet in each cpu input_pkt_queue pointing to the device we
> dismantle.
>
> RPS doesnt change this at all.
>
> Hmm ???
>
Thanks, I got it.
--
Regards,
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@...il.com)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists