netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] fasync: RCU locking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1271259264.16881.1703.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date:	Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:34:24 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] fasync: RCU locking

Le mercredi 14 avril 2010 à 16:57 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> Le mercredi 14 avril 2010 à 16:36 +0800, Lai Jiangshan a écrit :
> 
> > Since rcu_read_lock() protects fasync_struct *fa for us, we can access
> > to @fa safely even fasync_remove_entry() is just called.
> > 
> > But this patch does not ensure 'fa->fa_file is not freed' nor
> > 'fa->fa_fd is not released', so kill_fasync_rcu() may do wrong thing
> > if there is no other code ensure it.
> 
> You are 100% right, I forgot my old attempt to RCUified struct files
> failed...
> 
> Maybe its time to finally move f_owner out of struct file, and use RCU
> to free it.
> 
> In the mean time, adding a lock in fasync_struct is more than enough.
> 
> Thanks !
> 
> [PATCH net-next-2.6 v2] fasync: fine grained locking
> 
> kill_fasync() uses a central rwlock, candidate for RCU conversion, to
> avoid cache line ping pongs on SMP.
> 
> fasync_remove_entry() and fasync_add_entry() can disable IRQS on a short
> section instead during whole list scan.
> 
> Use a spinlock per fasync_struct to synchronize fasync_{remove|
> add}_entry() and kill_fasync_rcu()
> 
> We can remove __kill_fasync() direct use in net, and rename it to
> kill_fasync_rcu().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

Please wait for a v3 version, as net/socket.c sock_fasync() should be
updated too...



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html