netdev - Re: rps perfomance WAS(Re: rps: question

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1271268242.16881.1719.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date:	Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:04:02 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Cc:	hadi@...erus.ca, netdev@...r.kernel.org, robert@...julf.net,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: rps perfomance WAS(Re: rps: question

Le mercredi 14 avril 2010 à 10:31 -0700, Tom Herbert a écrit :
> The point of RPS is to increase parallelism, but the cost of that is
> more overhead per packet.  If you are running a single flow, then
> you'll see latency increase for that flow.  With more concurrent flows
> the benefits of parallelism kick in and latency gets better.-- we've
> seen the break even point around ten connections in our tests.  Also,
> I don't think we've made the claim that RPS should generally perform
> better than multi-queue, the primary motivation for RPS is make single
> queue NICs give reasonable performance.
> 

Yes, multiqueue is far better of course, but in case of hardware lacking
multiqueue, RPS can help many workloads, where application has _some_
work to do, not only counting frames or so...

RPS overhead (IPI, cache misses, ...) must be amortized by
parallelization or we lose.

A ping test is not an ideal candidate for RPS, since everything is done
at softirq level, and should be faster without RPS...



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html