[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <n2p412e6f7f1004151656q5f3f2cbeh324a859b88688398@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 07:56:28 +0800
From: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
To: hadi@...erus.ca
Cc: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
therbert@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, robert@...julf.net,
andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: rps perfomance WAS(Re: rps: question
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 4:16 AM, jamal <hadi@...erus.ca> wrote:
>
> Sounds interesting.
> Wikipedia information overload. Any arch description of the HP9000?
> Did your scheme use IPIs to message the other CPUs?
>
If you doubt the cost of smp_call_function_single(), how about having
a try with my another patch, which implements the similar of RPS, but
uses kernel threads instead, so no explicit IPI.
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/38319/
--
Regards,
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@...il.com)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists