netdev - Re: rps perfomance WAS(Re: rps: question

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100415.014212.51881085.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 15 Apr 2010 01:42:12 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	hadi@...erus.ca
Cc:	therbert@...gle.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, robert@...julf.net, xiaosuo@...il.com,
	andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: rps perfomance WAS(Re: rps: question

From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 07:53:06 -0400

> I base tested against no rps being used and a kernel which didnt
> have any RPS config on.  [BTW, I had to hand-edit the .config since
> i couldnt do it from menuconfig (Is there any reason for it to be
> so?)]

The RPS config is merely an indirect dependency on SMP as we have it
coded up in the Kconfig files, it's not meant to be user selectable
and is intended to be unconditionally on for SMP builds.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html